This case is a typical litigation example that achieved a perfect comeback through an outstanding procedural strategy and profound technical analysis.

This case is a pioneering one that triumphed by innovating legal theories and principles within the legal framework's blind spots.

This case is a typical example of ZYIP providing comprehensive services for Midea, including patent agency and infringement rights protection, and successfully winning the case. Moreover, other Midea patents handled by ZYIP have also won many cases in subsequent rights protection cases, which fully demonstrates the outstanding quality of ZYIP's patent agency services.

This case demonstrates the outstanding organizational and coordination capabilities as well as the professional legal strength of ZYIP in handling complex and large-scale series of rights protection lawsuits.

The ZYIP team, with their profound technical comprehension ability and forward-looking legal layout capabilities, has created for clients not just a patent right, but also a legal weapon that can withstand the long-term test of the market.

The core street lighting products of a leading international company in the field of optoelectronics have been accused of infringing on high-risk external patents, facing the threat of lawsuits and being hindered in the promotion of new products.