This case demonstrates that ZYIP, as the core product of a certain new energy enterprise, has received global patent risk assessment and response services from ZYIP.

The core product of a certain electronic equipment company has occupied 20% of the domestic market share within six months of its launch. However, it was subject to a complaint from its direct competitor, Company B, claiming "infringement of patent rights", and was faced with the risks of product suspension, inventory destruction, and huge compensation payments.

A certain medical device enterprise encountered serious product homogeneity, unclear research and development direction, and high infringement risks during its development process.

This case provides a profound illustration of the multi-dimensional value of patent layout in an enterprise's development strategy.

An optical detection instrument company has long faced the predicament of insufficient patent risk warning and repeated technical bottlenecks during the research and development process.

A technology enterprise in the field of industrial automation control, although possessing 320 patents, is currently facing management challenges such as unclear asset value and high maintenance costs.