The disputed trademark in this case is the cited trademark in the client's opposition review case. In the opposition review case, we found that the applied-for trademark is the upper part of the client's prior trademark, but it cited the disputed trademark which was rejected.

When applying for both combined trademarks and pure graphic trademarks, if the cited trademarks are exactly the same, and a re-examination application is filed simultaneously, the results of the re-examination will be completely opposite. The re-examination of the pure graphic trademark fails, while the re-examination of the combined trademark is successful.

ZYIP acts as an agent for Guangdong Midea Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "opponent") against Zhongshan Dongfeng Weihao Electrical Appliance Factory (hereinafter referred to as the "disputed party")

Shenzhen ZYIP Patent and Trademark Agency was entrusted by S.A.C.I. Falabeya Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Opposer") to raise an objection to the trademark "DENIM STUDIO" No. 10138973, which was preliminarily examined and published by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and appeared in the 1340th issue of the "Trademark Announcement". The trademark was applied for by Song Jingji (hereinafter referred to as the "Disputed Party").

Shenzhen ZYIP Patent and Trademark Agency was entrusted by S.A.C.I. Falabeya Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Opposer") to raise an objection to the trademark "MICAI" No. 9416595, which was preliminarily examined and published in the 1333th "Trademark Announcement" by the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, and was owned by Yanfang Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Respondent").

In November 2012, ZYIP Agency applied to the National Trademark Office for the "Xiangli" trademark (hereinafter referred to as the "Application Trademark") on goods in Class 11, such as "lighting equipment and devices, air purification sterilization lamps", etc. The application was rejected by the Trademark Office with a rejection notice of trademark ZC11756561BH1. After a review, it was approved for registration.