In this case, the plaintiff claimed that the trade secret was specific customer information. However, the evidence provided by the plaintiff was unable to clearly specify which information of the customers constituted the trade secret, making it difficult to determine that this customer information fell under the protection of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.

In this case, the patent rights of the two plaintiffs were declared invalid by the National Intellectual Property Administration. At this point, we accepted the commission of the two plaintiffs and promptly filed an administrative lawsuit with the court within the legal time limit. We presented evidence and specifically explained that the involved patent was creative compared to the existing technology, which was recognized by the court and successfully revoked the invalidation decision on the patent rights in question, thus safeguarding the legitimate interests of our clients.

In patent infringement litigation cases, in addition to directly defending against the plaintiff's claims, the defendant often takes other measures, such as filing a request for invalidating the plaintiff's relevant patent.

On November 8, 2017, the lawsuit filed by Taiwan Baixx Industrial Co., Ltd. against Xuxi Optoelectronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. regarding the "High Heat Dissipation Light Emitting Diode Device" patent infringement was officially ruled upon by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court. The一审judgment rejected all the litigation requests of the plaintiff， Baohong Industrial Co.， Ltd.， and also imposed the case's filing fees on them.